Built accounting evidence tree and QA framework

2 min read

Built accounting evidence tree and QA framework

  • Day: 2026-04-18
  • Time: 10:25 to 10:35
  • Project: Accounting
  • Workspace: WP 2: Operational
  • Status: Completed
  • Priority: HIGH
  • Assignee: Matías Nehuen Iglesias
  • Tags: Accounting, Qa, Evidence-Tree, Governance, Financial-Analysis, Obsidian

Description

Session Goal

Evaluate and reorganize human-facing accounting outputs from the MAL pipeline so they are legible, defensible, and useful for governance and narrative review rather than only technically correct.

Key Activities

  • Designed a next-stage review framework for accounting outputs, shifting the focus from infrastructure validation to human readability and argumentative strength.
  • Proposed four evaluation lenses for reviewing outputs, with guiding questions aimed at identifying whether a table or memo can support a clear financial narrative.
  • Structured a compact evidence kit for a patrimonial governance dispute, separating core economic tables, charts, narrative summaries, and explicit governance demands.
  • Classified multiple financial artifacts into a hierarchical evidence tree, distinguishing visible cash, debt/liquidity relationships, operating results, and supporting materials.
  • Performed methodological screening of financial tables and identified QA issues such as broken annual/quarterly P&L construction, mixed OPEX categories, unnormalized contributor labels, and incomplete debt coverage.
  • Reconstructed the first set of artifacts into seven narrative branches covering cash, liquidity, income, operating costs, rent drivers, and contributor support.

Achievements

  • Clarified the review criteria for accounting outputs in terms of human legibility, defensibility, and narrative power.
  • Established a reusable artifact architecture for evidence-based communication in a governance conflict.
  • Prioritized which tables are central evidence, which are supporting material, and which require reformulation or remain blocked by missing data.
  • Identified concrete QA fixes that would improve Obsidian-friendly knowledge capture and make the financial story easier to audit and communicate.

Pending Tasks

  • Implement the proposed low-cost code and formatting improvements for cleaner human-facing outputs.
  • Repair the broken P&L structures and normalize OPEX/contributor taxonomies.
  • Fill missing debt and temporal metadata needed to complete the evidence tree.
  • Convert the framework into a compact, reusable review checklist for future sessions.

Evidence

  • source_file=2026-04-18.sessions.jsonl, line_number=6, event_count=0, session_id=0476b5c5f3d90142481f45345a6d17a89ca6849e2d879546addc761bca054aac
  • event_ids: []

Graph View

Backlinks