Designed modular weekly governance board architecture

• Day: 2026-06-26
• Time: 12:05 to 12:15
• Project: Business
• Workspace: WP 1: Strategic / Growth & Development
• Status: Completed
• Priority: MEDIUM
• Assignee: Matías Nehuen Iglesias
• Tags: Weekly-Planning, Governance, Routines, Checklists, Workflow-Design, Obsidian

Description

Session Goal

Explore and formalize a weekly planning framework that treats the week as a governable surface rather than a task list, with a lightweight weekly sheet acting as an activation layer for routines and operational continuity.

Key Activities

• Proposed a territorial weekly board with layered structure: physical, functional, narrative, and governance layers.
• Refined the idea that the weekly sheet should trigger routines instead of embedding full checklists.
• Defined a three-level planning architecture:
  1. a minimal weekly sheet for high-value entry points,
  2. secondary manuals/runbooks for detailed procedures,
  3. supporting governance artifacts to keep the system navigable.
• Introduced route-based execution paths such as BOOT, MAINT, CLN-30, BODY, CARRY, CLOSE with minimal tick criteria and evidence requirements.
• Proposed a modular support stack: Weekly Board, Governance Map, Route Cards, and Digital Support Index to reduce cognitive load and preserve separation between navigation and execution.

Achievements

• Clarified the design principle that the weekly sheet is a control panel, not a repository of exhaustive tasks.
• Established a clearer distinction between entry points, routines, and manuals, improving maintainability and reducing friction.
• Identified implementation constraints: stable IDs, minimal columns, explicit done criteria, and a phased rollout.
• Strengthened the continuity model by making the weekly board a bridge from one week to the next, especially around carry-over and closeout.

Pending Tasks

• Translate the framework into a concrete template or Obsidian-ready artifact.
• Define the exact fields and IDs for each route card and support artifact.
• Specify the phased implementation sequence and test it against real weekly use.
• Validate whether the route set is complete or needs additional paths for edge cases.

Evidence

• source_file=2026-06-26.sessions.jsonl, line_number=4, event_count=0, session_id=43d1ac8cbf9fb785adf7395e03903d613a6716dd34037a9172478baed70f033c
• event_ids: []