Closed Block 3 frontend bundle export workflow

• Day: 2026-04-02
• Time: 10:05 to 10:25
• Project: Dev
• Workspace: WP 2: Operational
• Status: Completed
• Priority: MEDIUM
• Assignee: Matías Nehuen Iglesias
• Tags: Frontend, Export, Pipeline, Python, Debugging, Nextjs

Description

Session Goal

Define, validate, and close the technical design for Block 3 of the ingestion/publication pipeline: exporting a frontend bundle from the best available snapshots in the corpus, while avoiding fragile dependencies and ensuring the frontend consumes prepared, optimized data artifacts.

Key Activities

• Reviewed the Block 3 export specification and ratified the need for a separate artifact rather than coupling the frontend directly to raw pipeline outputs.
• Clarified the provenance and confidence-state requirements for exported data so downstream consumers can distinguish trusted snapshots from intermediate or uncertain material.
• Defined the exporter behavior, including expected inputs, output bundle structure, and operational constraints for the frontend bundle export script.
• Diagnosed Python/script execution issues:
  • fixed filename vs import-name mismatch causing import errors,
  • corrected misuse of the --run-id argument so it is treated strictly as an identifier, not a path,
  • clarified the proper relationship between run_root and run_id to avoid path confusion.
• Added operational guidance for verifying the script and, separately, provided Linux disk cleanup commands to support environment maintenance during execution.
• Performed a closure review for Block 3, confirming the block meets operational conditions and only minimal technical debt remains.
• Sketched sprint planning for a future Next.js application effort, with QA and deployment-oriented objectives.

Achievements

• Block 3 was formally closed as a coherent export stage in the pipeline.
• The design now emphasizes a clean boundary between ingestion/publication and frontend consumption via a dedicated bundle artifact.
• Key execution bugs were resolved or precisely documented, reducing ambiguity for future runs.
• The remaining debt was characterized as minimal and manageable, rather than blocking.

Pending Tasks

• Implement or verify the final exporter script in the repository using the corrected module/file naming and argument conventions.
• Confirm the export artifacts are produced consistently from valid runs and that validation reports reflect the intended confidence/provenance model.
• Revisit the minimal technical debt noted in the closure review during the next maintenance pass.
• If the Next.js sprint plan is active, translate it into concrete sprint tickets and QA/deployment checkpoints.

Evidence

• source_file=2026-04-02.sessions.jsonl, line_number=0, event_count=0, session_id=52923348ec26cbec77fd95b10c0215bb0cc675f665104b1bc1d0fa1a664b02a8
• event_ids: []